Akşener’s reaction to the agreement! The signature is a concession that is incompatible with the interests of the country.
Speaking at her party’s cluster meeting in the Grand National Assembly of Turkey, ÂLÂ Party General Leader Meral Akşener suggested that the signature of the government, without any concrete developments in Sweden and Finland, is a concession that is incompatible with the interests of the country.
ANKARA (IGFA) – IYI Party General Leader Meral Akşener reacted to the agreement signed in the middle of Turkey, Finland and Sweden.
Speaking at the parliamentary cluster meeting of his party, Akşener said, “This signature of the government, without any concrete developments in Sweden and Finland, is unfortunately a concession that is incompatible with the interests of our country.”
Akşener stated that the tripartite system that will be created to fulfill the commitments of Finland and Sweden according to the text of the memorandum will come into effect after the two countries become NATO members. He will have to talk about it, he will have to call an interlocutor,” he said.
“CONTRACTS WERE CROWNED IN NEGOTIATION…”
Arguing that the issue is not acceptable for Turkey, Akşener said, “The second point is that our country’s interest in the midst of the PKK and the YPG/PYD is carefully separated from each other in the text of the memorandum. Turkey’s state policy is However, in the 5th paragraph of the memorandum of understanding, the PKK is defined as a terrorist organization, while the YPG and PYD are defined as a national interest threat to Turkey. Sweden and Finland are against terrorist organizations. While talking about controlling financial aids and militant affiliates, paragraph 5 is pointed out again, PYD and YPG are excluded from this. That is, financial aids to PYD/YPG are excluded from the scope of the agreement . The discourses of the lectern, as always, seem to be crowned with concessions made at the negotiating table,” he said.
On the other hand, BEAUTIFUL Party General Leader Meral Akşener also said the BRSA’s decision on TL commercial loans and said, “This decision is a capital audit. This decision is an embargo imposed on Turkish companies by Mr. Crisis,” he said.